Comer v. Schriro

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 29, 2006·No. 98-99003·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT CHARLES COMER,  Petitioner-Appellant,

No. 98-99003

v.

TERRY L. STEWART, Director; DORA  D.C. No.

CV-94-01469-ROS

B. SCHRIRO, Director, of Arizona ORDER

Department of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees.

Filed December 29, 2006

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The threejudge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1 Judge Silverman was recused.

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Comer v. Schriro, (9th Cir. 2006).

Comer v. Schriro (Comer v. Schriro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.