Comer v. Murphy Oil USA
598 F.3d 208, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4253, 2010 WL 685796
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2010·No. No. 07-60756·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
A member of the court having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,
It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, 598 F.3d 208, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4253, 2010 WL 685796 (5th Cir. 2010).
598 F.3d 208 (Comer v. Murphy Oil USA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Laurie Freeman, Sharon Mockmore, Beccy Boysel, Gary D. Boysel, Linda L. Goreham, Gary R. Goreham, Kelcey Brackett, and Bobbie Lynn Weatherman v. Grain Processing Corporation
848 N.W.2d 58 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2014)
Servicios Azucareros De Venezuela, C.A. v. John Deere Thibodeaux, Inc.
702 F.3d 794 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
Comer v. Murphy Oil Usa, Inc.
839 F. Supp. 2d 849 (S.D. Mississippi, 2012)
ABECASSIS v. Wyatt
704 F. Supp. 2d 623 (S.D. Texas, 2010)
Comer v. Murphy Oil USA
607 F.3d 1049 (Fifth Circuit, 2010)