Comenitz v. Bank of Commerce
85 Miss. 662
This text of 85 Miss. 662 (Comenitz v. Bank of Commerce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Comenitz v. Bank of Commerce, 85 Miss. 662 (Mich. 1904).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The judgment was absolutely void as to appellant Comenitz, and, being an entirety, was void as to all the defendants. This is the well-settled Mississippi doctrine.
The decree is reversed, cause remanded, with instructions to reinstate the injunction and make it perpetual.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bank of Philadelphia v. Posey
92 So. 840 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1922)
Boutwell v. Grayson
79 So. 61 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1918)
Carrollton Hardware & Implement Co. v. Marshall
78 So. 7 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1918)
Catlett v. Drummond
74 So. 323 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)
Walker-Durr Co. v. Mitchell
52 So. 583 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
85 Miss. 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comenitz-v-bank-of-commerce-miss-1904.