Comenitz v. Bank of Commerce

85 Miss. 662
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1904·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Whitfield, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The judgment was absolutely void as to appellant Comenitz, and, being an entirety, was void as to all the defendants. This is the well-settled Mississippi doctrine.

The decree is reversed, cause remanded, with instructions to reinstate the injunction and make it perpetual.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Comenitz v. Bank of Commerce, 85 Miss. 662 (Mich. 1904).

85 Miss. 662 (Comenitz v. Bank of Commerce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Philadelphia v. Posey
92 So. 840 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1922)
Boutwell v. Grayson
79 So. 61 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1918)
Carrollton Hardware & Implement Co. v. Marshall
78 So. 7 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1918)
Catlett v. Drummond
74 So. 323 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)
Walker-Durr Co. v. Mitchell
52 So. 583 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1910)