Comeaux v. West

97 P. 381, 78 Kan. 404, 1908 Kan. LEXIS 72
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJune 6, 1908
DocketNo. 15,569
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 97 P. 381 (Comeaux v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Comeaux v. West, 97 P. 381, 78 Kan. 404, 1908 Kan. LEXIS 72 (kan 1908).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

R. L. Comeaux entered into a contract with John H. West and D. C. Barnes to purchase a hotel property, for which he was to make payments in certain instalments at specified times. He obtained possession of the property, but failed to make the payments or to comply with the conditions of the purchase. West and Barnes began this proceeding to cancel the contract and to recover possession of the property, and they finally secured a judgment to that effect. It was decreed that if possession was not surrendered within three days execution should issue directing the sheriff [405]*405to evict the defendants and put plaintiffs in possession of the property. Within a few days after the judgment was rendered the defendants surrendered the possession of the premises in accordance with the decree, but they are here insisting on a review of the judgment with which they have complied. The plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the proceeding in error because of the voluntary surrender of the possession and the compliance with the judgment must be allowed; The recovery of possession, because of non-compliance with the contract which was canceled, was the important thing in litigation, and when the defendants voluntarily surrendered possession they necessarily waived the right to prosecute error. The fact -that the decree ordered restitution and that an execution for that purpose was authorized but had not been issued does not amount to duress nor avoid the effect of the waiver consequent upon the compliance with the judgment.

The proceeding is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huet-Vaughn v. Kansas State Board of Healing Arts
978 P.2d 896 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1999)
Steen v. Colombo
799 S.W.2d 169 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1990)
Haberer v. Newman
549 P.2d 975 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1976)
Selected Products Corp. v. Humphreys
86 F.2d 821 (Seventh Circuit, 1936)
Burnett v. Tipton
89 S.W.2d 440 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Simoens v. McMahon
187 Iowa 462 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 P. 381, 78 Kan. 404, 1908 Kan. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comeaux-v-west-kan-1908.