Comby v. State

106 So. 827, 141 Miss. 561, 1926 Miss. LEXIS 465
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided February 1, 1926·No. No. 24733.·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

*564 Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a conviction for having- intoxicating, liquor in possession. The evidence oil which the conviction is based was that of a constable, who testified, over the appellant’s objection, that, pursuant to a warrant issued by a justice of the peace therefor, he searched the person of the appellant, over his protest, and found two bottles of intoxicating liquor in his coat pocket.

We have no statute which authorizes the issuance of a warrant for the search of the person of an individual, and the common law provides “only for the searching, under the warrant, of some place or locality.” I Bish. Crim. Pro. (4 Ed.), section 240, from which it necessarily follows that - the warrant under which this search was made was void, and the evidence procured thereby was inadmissible. Orick v. State (Miss.), 105 So. 465.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Comby v. State, 106 So. 827, 141 Miss. 561, 1926 Miss. LEXIS 465 (Mich. 1926).

106 So. 827 (Comby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gregg v. State
374 So. 2d 1301 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1979)
Scott v. State
266 So. 2d 567 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1972)
Stewart v. City of Jackson
174 So. 56 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1937)
Banks v. City of Jackson
120 So. 209 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)
Robinson v. State
108 So. 503 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1926)
Duckworth v. Town of Taylorsville
107 So. 666 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1926)