Combs v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Combs v. State

1926 OK CR 83, 243 P. 1118, 33 Okla. Crim. 355, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 75

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided March 13, 1926·No. No. A-5328.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of harboring, feeding, aiding, concealing, and assisting to escape a fugitive from justice, with his punishment fixed at imprisonment for six months in the state penitentiary. No briefs have been filed in support of this appeal, and the time for briefing has long since passed. An examination of the record shows that the information is sufficient, that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction, and that the instructions of the court fafrly and correctly stated the law of the case. The defendant otherwise had a fair trial. . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of harboring, feeding, aiding, concealing, and assisting to escape a fugitive from justice, with his punishment fixed at imprisonment for six months in the state penitentiary. No briefs have been filed in support of this appeal, and the time for briefing has long since passed. An examination of the record shows that the information is sufficient, that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction, and that the instructions of the court fafrly and correctly stated the law of the case. The defendant otherwise had a fair trial. . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Combs v. State, 1926 OK CR 83, 243 P. 1118, 33 Okla. Crim. 355, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 75 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

1926 OK CR 83 (Combs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.