Combs v. Social Security Administration
This text of Combs v. Social Security Administration (Combs v. Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
MICHAEL TODD COMBS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Case No. CIV-23-281-GLJ MARTIN O’MALLEY,1 ) Commissioner of the Social ) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. )
OPINION AND ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES TO THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE EAJA
Plaintiff Michael Todd Combs is the prevailing party in this action under the Social Security Act. Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,263.00 for 3.7 hours of attorney work, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) [Docket No. 15], as well as costs in the amount of $402.00 for reimbursement of the filing fee, pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1920 [Docket No. 16]. The Commissioner has no objection to the fee award [Docket No. 17] or the application for reimbursement of costs [Docket No. 18]. Upon review of the record herein, the Court finds that the requested amounts are reasonable and that the Commissioner should be ordered to pay them to Plaintiff as the
1 On December 20, 2023, Martin J. O’Malley became the Commissioner of Social Security. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Mr. O’Malley is substituted for Kilolo Kijakazi as the Defendant in this action. prevailing party herein. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (“Except as otherwise specifically provided by statute, a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States
fees and other expenses, in addition to any costs awarded pursuant to subsection (a), incurred by that party in any civil action (other than cases sounding in tort)[.]”); see also Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246, 1251 (10th Cir. 2007) (“The EAJA therefore permits attorney’s fees reimbursement to financially eligible prevailing parties, who make a proper application, and not to their attorneys.”). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application for Award of Attorney’s
Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act [Docket No. 15], and Application for Reimbursement of Costs and/or Expenses Under the Equal Access to Justice Act and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 [Docket No. 16] are hereby granted and that the Government is therefore ordered to pay the above-referenced amounts to Plaintiff as the prevailing party herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff’s attorney is subsequently awarded any fees
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), said attorney shall refund the smaller amount of such fees to the Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). DATED this 30th day of January, 2024.
______________________________________ GERALD L. JACKSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Combs v. Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/combs-v-social-security-administration-oked-2024.