Combs v. Combs

90 S.E. 862, 146 Ga. 112, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 612
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1916·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

“An application for temporary alimony must be’ based on a pending suit for divorce or for permanent alimony. In the present ease the' petition was one merely for temporary alimony, and did not give the judge jurisdiction at chambers, in the absence of a showing that there was a suit for divorce or for permanent alimony pending, to allow temporary alimony.” Pitts v. Pitts, 144 Ga. 423 (87 S. E. 391).

(а) The ruling just stated going to the jurisdiction of the court relating to the subject-matter, it was not too late to raise the question for the first time by excepting to the judgment.

(б) Applying the foregoing principles, it was erroneous to grant temporary alimony. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Combs v. Combs, 90 S.E. 862, 146 Ga. 112, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 612 (Ga. 1916).

90 S.E. 862 (Combs v. Combs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whaley v. Whaley
66 S.E.2d 722 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Pelot v. Pelot
18 S.E.2d 548 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Sellers v. Sellers
164 S.E. 769 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Wilson v. Wilson
153 S.E. 9 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Mason v. Mason
107 S.E. 331 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)