Combined Metals Reduction Co. v. Tooele County

176 P.2d 630, 111 Utah 188, 1947 Utah LEXIS 128
Utah Supreme Court·Decided January 6, 1947·No. No. 6907.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

This is a companion case to United States Smelting, Refining Mining Co. v. Phares Haynes, County Treasurer of TooeleCounty, decided this day, 111 Utah 172, 176 P.2d 622. The essential facts are the same and the issues present the same questions. The only essential difference is that here judgment was entered on the pleadings, while in that case evidence was taken. Since there is no essential difference in the facts and the issues are the same, the results must be the same. Upon the conclusions reached in that case, the judgment herein must be reversed. It is so ordered. Costs to appellants.

McDONOUGH, WADE, and WOLFE, JJ., concur.

PRATT, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his opinion inUnited States Smelting, Refining and Mining Company v. PharesHaynes, as County Treasurer of Tooele County. *Page 189

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Combined Metals Reduction Co. v. Tooele County, 176 P.2d 630, 111 Utah 188, 1947 Utah LEXIS 128 (Utah 1947).

176 P.2d 630 (Combined Metals Reduction Co. v. Tooele County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Consolidated Coppermines Corp. v. State
231 P.2d 197 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1951)