Combier v. Anderson

26 A.D.3d 269, 808 N.Y.S.2d 902
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Combier v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 A.D.3d 333

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lottie E. Wilkins, J.), entered August 24, 2004, which denied plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict in defendants’ favor, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The jury’s determination that defendants’ brief delay in returning plaintiffs mother’s ashes was justified, under the circumstances, is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 133-134 [1985]). The verdict also is not irrational as a matter of law (see Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499 [1978]).

We have examined plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them without merit. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Sullivan and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Combier v. Anderson, 26 A.D.3d 269, 808 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

26 A.D.3d 269 (Combier v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.
382 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Nicastro v. Park
113 A.D.2d 129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)