Combader v. Eberhardt's Bus Service, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Combader v. Eberhardt's Bus Service, Inc.

50 A.D.2d 919, 377 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11844

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 919 (Combader v. Eberhardt's Bus Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Combader v. Eberhardt's Bus Service, Inc., 50 A.D.2d 919, 377 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal and property injuries, defendants appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 7, 1975, in favor of plaintiff on the issue of liability, upon a jury verdict, at a trial limited to that issue. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. In this action arising from a rear-end collision, the failure of the trial court to marshal the evidence or relate the contentions of the parties to the legal principles charged to the jury did not constitute reversible error. The case was a simple one, the summations just prior to the charge dealt with the respective factual contentions in detail, and it appears that appellants could not have prevailed under any view of the facts (see Leone v Rybar Realty Corp., 5 AD2d 871). Rabin, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal and property injuries, defendants appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 7, 1975, in favor of plaintiff on the issue of liability, upon a jury verdict, at a trial limited to that issue. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. In this action arising from a rear-end collision, the failure of the trial court to marshal the evidence or relate the contentions of the parties to the legal principles charged to the jury did not constitute reversible error. The case was a simple one, the summations just prior to the charge dealt with the respective factual contentions in detail, and it appears that appellants could not have prevailed under any view of the facts (see Leone v Rybar Realty Corp., 5 AD2d 871). Rabin, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 919, 377 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/combader-v-eberhardts-bus-service-inc-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack