Comba v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Comba v. State

1925 OK CR 35, 232 P. 450, 29 Okla. Crim. 79, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 21

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 27, 1925

DocketNo. A-4737.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 35 (Comba v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Comba v. State, 1925 OK CR 35, 232 P. 450, 29 Okla. Crim. 79, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 21 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error, John Comba, was tried upon an information charging that he did have in his possession about 10 gallons of whisky with the unlawful intent to sell the same. He was found guilty by the jury and his punishment fixed at a fine of $500 and confinement in the county jail for six months. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appealed by filing in this court on June 21, 1923, a petition in error with case-made; but no •brief in support of the assignments of error has been filed and no appearance made in his behalf in this court.

An examination of the record discloses that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict, and there is no prejudicial error in the rulings upon the admission of evidence. The instructions fairly stated the law applicable to the case.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error, John Comba, was tried upon an information charging that he did have in his possession about 10 gallons of whisky with the unlawful intent to sell the same. He was found guilty by the jury and his punishment fixed at a fine of $500 and confinement in the county jail for six months. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appealed by filing in this court on June 21, 1923, a petition in error with case-made; but no •brief in support of the assignments of error has been filed and no appearance made in his behalf in this court.

An examination of the record discloses that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict, and there is no prejudicial error in the rulings upon the admission of evidence. The instructions fairly stated the law applicable to the case.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 35, 232 P. 450, 29 Okla. Crim. 79, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comba-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.