Comas v. State

15 So. 3d 933, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11231, 2009 WL 2448115
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 12, 2009
Docket1D08-3664
StatusPublished

This text of 15 So. 3d 933 (Comas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Comas v. State, 15 So. 3d 933, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11231, 2009 WL 2448115 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence, but reverse and remand for correction of a scrivener’s error.

The jury found the appellant guilty of section 810.02(3)(a), Florida Statutes, burglary of a dwelling. The trial court properly pronounced judgment, but the written judgment indicates that the appellant was *934 convicted of section 810.02(2)(b), Florida Statutes. The trial court is therefore directed to conform the written judgment to its oral pronouncement.

WEBSTER, BENTON, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 So. 3d 933, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11231, 2009 WL 2448115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comas-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.