Comas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Comas v. State

15 So. 3d 933, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11231, 2009 WL 2448115

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Comas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12399 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 12, 2009·No. 1D08-3664·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence, but reverse and remand for correction of a scrivener’s error.

The jury found the appellant guilty of section 810.02(3)(a), Florida Statutes, burglary of a dwelling. The trial court properly pronounced judgment, but the written judgment indicates that the appellant was *934 convicted of section 810.02(2)(b), Florida Statutes. The trial court is therefore directed to conform the written judgment to its oral pronouncement.

WEBSTER, BENTON, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence, but reverse and remand for correction of a scrivener’s error.

The jury found the appellant guilty of section 810.02(3)(a), Florida Statutes, burglary of a dwelling. The trial court properly pronounced judgment, but the written judgment indicates that the appellant was *934 convicted of section 810.02(2)(b), Florida Statutes. The trial court is therefore directed to conform the written judgment to its oral pronouncement.

WEBSTER, BENTON, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Comas v. State, 15 So. 3d 933, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11231, 2009 WL 2448115 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

15 So. 3d 933 (Comas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related