Comas v. State
This text of 15 So. 3d 933 (Comas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence, but reverse and remand for correction of a scrivener’s error.
The jury found the appellant guilty of section 810.02(3)(a), Florida Statutes, burglary of a dwelling. The trial court properly pronounced judgment, but the written judgment indicates that the appellant was *934 convicted of section 810.02(2)(b), Florida Statutes. The trial court is therefore directed to conform the written judgment to its oral pronouncement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 So. 3d 933, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11231, 2009 WL 2448115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comas-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.