Comas v. Department of Banking & Finance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Comas v. Department of Banking & Finance

820 So. 2d 1088, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10055, 2002 WL 1559461

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 17, 2002

DocketNo. 3D01-2050

StatusPublished

This text of 820 So. 2d 1088 (Comas v. Department of Banking & Finance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Comas v. Department of Banking & Finance, 820 So. 2d 1088, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10055, 2002 WL 1559461 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Marta Mantecón Comas appeals .an order revoking her license as a mortgage broker. We agree with the Department of Banking and Finance that the material facts of the case are largely undisputed, and we see no reversible error in the proceedings below. As the Department stated in its order:

Appellant’s conduct in altering a customer check, depositing it in her personal account, and later writing a letter to the customer on company letterhead falsely stating that the funds were in the hands of the title company jeopardized not only the customer, but also .her employer and the title company.. This conduct violates the numerous statutory provisions referenced in the Final Order, casts considerable doubt on either Appellant’s competence, integrity, or both, and clearly warrants license revocation.

[1089]*1089Revocation of the license was within the Department’s authority. See § 494.0041, Florida Statutes (1997).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Marta Mantecón Comas appeals .an order revoking her license as a mortgage broker. We agree with the Department of Banking and Finance that the material facts of the case are largely undisputed, and we see no reversible error in the proceedings below. As the Department stated in its order:

Appellant’s conduct in altering a customer check, depositing it in her personal account, and later writing a letter to the customer on company letterhead falsely stating that the funds were in the hands of the title company jeopardized not only the customer, but also .her employer and the title company.. This conduct violates the numerous statutory provisions referenced in the Final Order, casts considerable doubt on either Appellant’s competence, integrity, or both, and clearly warrants license revocation.

[1089]*1089Revocation of the license was within the Department’s authority. See § 494.0041, Florida Statutes (1997).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

820 So. 2d 1088, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10055, 2002 WL 1559461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comas-v-department-of-banking-finance-fladistctapp-2002.