Comando v. Erie R. Co.

Sixth Circuit

Comando v. Erie R. Co.

299 F. 1022, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3137

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJuly 2, 1924

DocketNo. 3987

StatusPublished

This text of 299 F. 1022 (Comando v. Erie R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Comando v. Erie R. Co., 299 F. 1022, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3137 (6th Cir. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case must be affirmed on the authority of Industrial Commission v. Davis, 259 U. S. 182, 42 Sup. Ct. 489, 66 L. Ed. 888. Giving plaintiff the benefit of the doubt and assuming that there was an expressed, though revocable, intention to return the engine to interstate service at an unknown future time, when the repairs should be finished, we 'think this does not make a substantial distinction between the cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case must be affirmed on the authority of Industrial Commission v. Davis, 259 U. S. 182, 42 Sup. Ct. 489, 66 L. Ed. 888. Giving plaintiff the benefit of the doubt and assuming that there was an expressed, though revocable, intention to return the engine to interstate service at an unknown future time, when the repairs should be finished, we 'think this does not make a substantial distinction between the cases.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 F. 1022, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comando-v-erie-r-co-ca6-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack