Com. v. Thompson, R.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 29, 2016·No. 3604 EDA 2015·Unpublished

Opinion

J-S71023-16

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

ROBERT STEVEN THOMPSON, JR.

Appellant No. 3604 EDA 2015

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence October 29, 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-23-CR-0003334-2014

BEFORE: BOWES, J., PANELLA, J., and FITZGERALD, J.*

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED NOVEMBER 29, 2016

Appellant, Robert Steven Thompson, Jr., appeals from the judgment of

sentence entered after he was convicted of disorderly conduct, possession of

marijuana, and harassment. However, Thompson’s counsel concedes that

the post-sentence motion and notice of appeal were untimely filed. Counsel

requests, in the interests of justice, that we nevertheless treat this appeal as

timely. This we cannot do. See Commonwealth v. Burks, 102 A.3d 497,

500 (Pa. Super. 2014).

Here, as in Burks, there was no fraud or breakdown in the court’s

operation, merely a mistake by counsel. We have no authority to excuse

____________________________________________

* Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court. J-S71023-16

Thompson’s untimely notice of appeal, and therefore quash. Thus,

Thompson’s motion to proceed pro se is moot.

Appeal quashed. Motion to proceed pro se denied as moot.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 11/29/2016

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Com. v. Thompson, R., (Pa. Ct. App. 2016).

Com. v. Thompson, R. (Com. v. Thompson, R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Burks
102 A.3d 497 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)