Com. v. Smithkline Beckman Corp.

498 A.2d 374, 508 Pa. 359

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 3, 1985·Published

Opinion

508 Pa. 359 (1985) 498 A.2d 374

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
SMITHKLINE BECKMAN CORPORATION.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 18, 1985. Decided October 3, 1985.

*360 Suellen M. Wolfe, Harrisburg, for appellant.

Robert R. Batt, Bonnie S. Brier, James A. Lebovitz, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, Philadelphia, for appellee.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

FLAHERTY, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

508 Pa. 359 (1985) 498 A.2d 374

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
SMITHKLINE BECKMAN CORPORATION.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 18, 1985. Decided October 3, 1985.

*360 Suellen M. Wolfe, Harrisburg, for appellant.

Robert R. Batt, Bonnie S. Brier, James A. Lebovitz, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, Philadelphia, for appellee.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

FLAHERTY, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Com. v. Smithkline Beckman Corp., 498 A.2d 374, 508 Pa. 359 (Pa. 1985).

Pincite

498 A.2d 374 (Com. v. Smithkline Beckman Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. SmithKline Beckman Corp.

498 A.2d 374 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)