Com. v. Smithkline Beckman Corp.
498 A.2d 374, 508 Pa. 359
This text of 498 A.2d 374 (Com. v. Smithkline Beckman Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Com. v. Smithkline Beckman Corp., 498 A.2d 374, 508 Pa. 359 (Pa. 1985).
Opinion
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
SMITHKLINE BECKMAN CORPORATION.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
*360 Suellen M. Wolfe, Harrisburg, for appellant.
Robert R. Batt, Bonnie S. Brier, James A. Lebovitz, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, Philadelphia, for appellee.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order affirmed.
FLAHERTY, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. SmithKline Beckman Corp.
498 A.2d 374 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
498 A.2d 374, 508 Pa. 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/com-v-smithkline-beckman-corp-pa-1985.