Com. v. Schweizer, W.
This text of Com. v. Schweizer, W. (Com. v. Schweizer, W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J-A34010-14
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee
v.
WALTER R. SCHWEIZER
Appellant No. 369 MDA 2014
Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence entered December 20, 2013 In the Court of Common Pleas of York County Criminal Division at No: CP-67-CR-0008282-2012
BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., SHOGAN, and STABILE, JJ.
DISSENTING MEMORANDUM BY STABILE, J.: FILED APRIL 14, 2015
I respectfully dissent and would vacate the sentence and remand for
resentencing.
I do not disagree with the Majority’s general statement that failure to
take responsibility and lack of remorse are proper sentencing factors to be
considered by a trial court. In this case, however, I am unable to separate
these general considerations from the context in which they were referenced
by the trial court. The trial court’s reference to lack of remorse and failure
to take responsibility were stated in response to Appellant’s actions to
withdraw his guilty plea and exercise his right to go to trial. A defendant
who chooses to “go to trial and roll the dice” exercises a right guaranteed by
our federal and state constitutions. I therefore, would find error under
Commonwealth v. Bethea, 379 A.2d 102 (Pa. 1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Com. v. Schweizer, W., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/com-v-schweizer-w-pasuperct-2015.