Com. v. Robinson and Kuemmerle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Com. v. Robinson and Kuemmerle

170 A. 693, 111 Pa. Super. 462, 1934 Pa. Super. LEXIS 351

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 16, 1933

DocketAppeal 355

StatusPublished

This text of 170 A. 693 (Com. v. Robinson and Kuemmerle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Com. v. Robinson and Kuemmerle, 170 A. 693, 111 Pa. Super. 462, 1934 Pa. Super. LEXIS 351 (Pa. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion- by

Jambs, J.,

The defendant, Harry Kuemmerle, was indicted with Alexander D. Robinson on October 26, 1932 for having on the 6th day of December, 1928 aided and abetted Christian A. Fisher and Harry a Rau, vice-president and treasurer, respectively, of the Oak Lane Mutual Building and Loan Association, in the embezzlement, abstraction and wilful misapplication of certain funds of the said Oak Lane Mutual Building and Loan Association. Defendant moved to quash and the motion was sustained, from which order an appeal was taken by the Commonwealth.

The same question raised in this appeal is involved in the appeal of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Russell H. Foster, 111 Pa. Superior Ct. 451, No. 356, October Term, 1933, in which an opinion has this day been filed sustaining the action of the court below in quashing the indictment. For the reasons therein set forth the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion- by

Jambs, J.,

The defendant, Harry Kuemmerle, was indicted with Alexander D. Robinson on October 26, 1932 for having on the 6th day of December, 1928 aided and abetted Christian A. Fisher and Harry a Rau, vice-president and treasurer, respectively, of the Oak Lane Mutual Building and Loan Association, in the embezzlement, abstraction and wilful misapplication of certain funds of the said Oak Lane Mutual Building and Loan Association. Defendant moved to quash and the motion was sustained, from which order an appeal was taken by the Commonwealth.

The same question raised in this appeal is involved in the appeal of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Russell H. Foster, 111 Pa. Superior Ct. 451, No. 356, October Term, 1933, in which an opinion has this day been filed sustaining the action of the court below in quashing the indictment. For the reasons therein set forth the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 A. 693, 111 Pa. Super. 462, 1934 Pa. Super. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/com-v-robinson-and-kuemmerle-pasuperct-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack