Com. v. Redmond

600 A.2d 190, 528 Pa. 601
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 10, 1992
StatusPublished

This text of 600 A.2d 190 (Com. v. Redmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Com. v. Redmond, 600 A.2d 190, 528 Pa. 601 (Pa. 1992).

Opinion

528 Pa. 601 (1992)
600 A.2d 190

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
William Henry REDMOND.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued December 4, 1991.
Decided January 10, 1992.

William H. Ryan, Jr., Dist. Atty., Dennis C. McAndrews, Deputy Dist. Atty., for appellant.

Michael J. Malloy, Media, for appellee.

*602 Arthur Thomas Donato, Jr., Media, for amicus Pa. Assoc. of Crim. Defense Lawyers.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

McDERMOTT, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Redmond
600 A.2d 190 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
600 A.2d 190, 528 Pa. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/com-v-redmond-pa-1992.