Com. v. Peterson

44 A.3d 655, 615 Pa. 587

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 23, 2012·No. 56 EAP 2011·Published

Opinion

44 A.3d 655 (2012)

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee
v.
Darius PETERSON, Appellant.

No. 56 EAP 2011.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued May 8, 2012. Decided May 23, 2012.

Karl Baker, Jeffrey P. Shender, Rebecca Braglio, Defender Association of Philadelphia, for Darius Peterson.

Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Philadelphia, Max Kaufman, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, ORIE MELVIN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2012, the order of the Superior Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

44 A.3d 655 (2012)

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee
v.
Darius PETERSON, Appellant.

No. 56 EAP 2011.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued May 8, 2012. Decided May 23, 2012.

Karl Baker, Jeffrey P. Shender, Rebecca Braglio, Defender Association of Philadelphia, for Darius Peterson.

Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Philadelphia, Max Kaufman, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, ORIE MELVIN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2012, the order of the Superior Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Com. v. Peterson, 44 A.3d 655, 615 Pa. 587 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

44 A.3d 655 (Com. v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.