Com. v. Mora, J. of Arriaga
This text of Com. v. Mora, J. of Arriaga (Com. v. Mora, J. of Arriaga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 64 MM 2018 : : v. : : : JORGE PARAMO MORA : : : PETITION OF: AMPARITO ARRIAGA, : ESQUIRE :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2018, in consideration of the “Motion of Amparito
Arriaga for Leave to Withdraw,” this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas
of Chester County for that court to determine whether counsel should be granted leave
to withdraw. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 120(B) (providing that an attorney may not unilaterally
withdraw his or her appearance in a criminal matter; rather, a court must determine
whether leave to withdraw is warranted).
If the attorney is permitted to withdraw, the court is DIRECTED to determine
whether Jorge Paramo Mora is to be appointed new counsel or is to proceed pro se. The
Court of Common Pleas of Chester County is DIRECTED to enter its order regarding this
remand within 45 days and to promptly notify this Court of its determination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Com. v. Mora, J. of Arriaga, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/com-v-mora-j-of-arriaga-pa-2018.