Com. v. Lucas, T.

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 25, 2019
Docket1037 WDA 2018
StatusUnpublished

This text of Com. v. Lucas, T. (Com. v. Lucas, T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Com. v. Lucas, T., (Pa. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

J-S31005-19

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : THOMAS MICHAEL LUCAS : : Appellant : No. 1037 WDA 2018

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered June 7, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-10-SA-0000036-2018

BEFORE: OLSON, J., STABILE, J., and McLAUGHLIN, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY OLSON, J.: FILED JUNE 25, 2019

Appellant, Thomas Michael Lucas, appeals from the judgment of

sentence entered on June 7, 2018, in the Butler County Court of Common

Pleas. Appellant failed to preserve any issues for appellate review, as such,

we affirm.

On June 7, 2018, Appellant pled guilty to the summary charge of driving

while operating privilege is suspended or revoked.1 The trial court sentenced

Appellant to pay the costs of prosecution, a $500.00 fine, and 60 days of

house arrest with electronic monitoring. On July 5, 2018, Appellant filed a

notice of appeal. On July 27, 2018, the trial court, in compliance with

Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b), directed Appellant to file a concise statement of matters

____________________________________________

1 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1543(b)(1) J-S31005-19

complained of on appeal within 21 days or risk waiver of his claims. Appellant

failed to file a concise statement. Accordingly, Appellant has waived his

claims.2 See. Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b); Commonwealth v. Lagenella, 17 A.3d

1257, 1265 (Pa. Super. 2011), reversed on other grounds, 83 A.3d 94 (Pa.

2013); Commonwealth v. Kimble, 756 A.2d 78, 80 (Pa. Super. 2000).

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 6/25/2019

2 Moreover, Appellant’s one-page, handwritten brief fails in its entirety to comply with the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure, including the failure to present any issues or provide any argument. See Pa.R.A.P. 2111, 2114-2119.

-2- J-S31005-19

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Kimble
756 A.2d 78 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)
Commonwealth v. Lagenella
17 A.3d 1257 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Commonwealth v. Lagenella
83 A.3d 94 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Com. v. Lucas, T., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/com-v-lucas-t-pasuperct-2019.