Com. v. Jones, D.
This text of Com. v. Jones, D. (Com. v. Jones, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J-S54014-18
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : DEANDRE LEVON JONES : : Appellant : No. 1781 WDA 2017
Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence September 26, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-25-CR-0001457-2017
BEFORE: PANELLA, J., LAZARUS, J., and MURRAY, J.
JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J.: FILED JANUARY 11, 2019
Appellant, Deandre Levon Jones, appeals from the judgment of sentence
entered in the Erie County Court of Common Pleas, following his convictions
for drug offenses. We affirm.
Briefly, Appellant was caught selling heroin to a confidential informant.
He pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute, criminal use of a
communications facility, and driving under a suspended license, and was
sentenced to an aggregate six to fourteen years’ incarceration. Appellant filed
a timely post-sentence motion, which was denied, and a notice of appeal.
In evaluating the appeal, this panel determined Appellant’s challenge to
the calculation of his prior record score was without merit. However, Appellant
also raised a second issue, alleging the trial court miscalculated his applicable
credit for time served. We remanded for a determination of whether Appellant
was owed additional credit for time served, and retained jurisdiction. J-S54014-18
On remand, the trial court found Appellant was owed 58 days of credit
time. The court ordered the credit applied to Appellant’s sentence. This case
is again before us.
Typically, the pendency of an appeal strips the trial court of its ability to
modify an order. See 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5505. However, a trial court may “[t]ake
any action directed or authorized on application by the appellate court.”
Pa.R.A.P. 1701(b)(5). On remand, we explicitly instructed the trial court to
award Appellant credit for time served, if the court found such credit had not
been previously given. Thus, the trial court’s credit order of 58 days resolves
our inquiry, and affords Appellant relief on his remaining appellate issue. We
therefore affirm his judgment of sentence.
Judgment of sentence affirmed. Jurisdiction relinquished.
Judgment Entered.
Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary
Date: 1/11/2019
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Com. v. Jones, D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/com-v-jones-d-pasuperct-2019.