Com. v. Jones, D.

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 11, 2019
Docket1781 WDA 2017
StatusUnpublished

This text of Com. v. Jones, D. (Com. v. Jones, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Com. v. Jones, D., (Pa. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

J-S54014-18

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : DEANDRE LEVON JONES : : Appellant : No. 1781 WDA 2017

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence September 26, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-25-CR-0001457-2017

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., LAZARUS, J., and MURRAY, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J.: FILED JANUARY 11, 2019

Appellant, Deandre Levon Jones, appeals from the judgment of sentence

entered in the Erie County Court of Common Pleas, following his convictions

for drug offenses. We affirm.

Briefly, Appellant was caught selling heroin to a confidential informant.

He pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute, criminal use of a

communications facility, and driving under a suspended license, and was

sentenced to an aggregate six to fourteen years’ incarceration. Appellant filed

a timely post-sentence motion, which was denied, and a notice of appeal.

In evaluating the appeal, this panel determined Appellant’s challenge to

the calculation of his prior record score was without merit. However, Appellant

also raised a second issue, alleging the trial court miscalculated his applicable

credit for time served. We remanded for a determination of whether Appellant

was owed additional credit for time served, and retained jurisdiction. J-S54014-18

On remand, the trial court found Appellant was owed 58 days of credit

time. The court ordered the credit applied to Appellant’s sentence. This case

is again before us.

Typically, the pendency of an appeal strips the trial court of its ability to

modify an order. See 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5505. However, a trial court may “[t]ake

any action directed or authorized on application by the appellate court.”

Pa.R.A.P. 1701(b)(5). On remand, we explicitly instructed the trial court to

award Appellant credit for time served, if the court found such credit had not

been previously given. Thus, the trial court’s credit order of 58 days resolves

our inquiry, and affords Appellant relief on his remaining appellate issue. We

therefore affirm his judgment of sentence.

Judgment of sentence affirmed. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 1/11/2019

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 5505
Pennsylvania § 5505

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Com. v. Jones, D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/com-v-jones-d-pasuperct-2019.