Com. v. Funes Coreas, C.

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 13, 2024
Docket268 MDA 2024
StatusUnpublished

This text of Com. v. Funes Coreas, C. (Com. v. Funes Coreas, C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Com. v. Funes Coreas, C., (Pa. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

J-S33027-24

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : CARLOS ALBERTO FUNES COREAS : : Appellant : No. 268 MDA 2024

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered December 5, 2022 In the Court of Common Pleas of York County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-67-CR-0005045-2020

BEFORE: OLSON, J., KUNSELMAN, J., and NICHOLS, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY KUNSELMAN, J.: FILED: SEPTEMBER 13, 2024

Carlos Alberto Funes Coreas has appealed from his judgment of

sentence, following this Court’s remand for the trial court to apply the correct

standard to assess Funes Coreas’ claim that the verdict was against the weight

of the evidence. Funes Coreas argues for the first time on appeal that the

trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on his post-sentence motion before this

Court returned the record to the trial court. We agree. “[A] trial court has no

jurisdiction over a case until an appellate court returns the record to it with

instructions for the trial court to proceed.” Commonwealth v. Harris, 230

A.3d 1124, 1127 (Pa. Super. 2020). Our directive, filed December 21, 2023,

was not received in the trial court until February 2, 2024. The trial court’s

order entered January 22, 2024, is therefore “a legal nullity.” See id.1 ____________________________________________

1 We reject the Commonwealth’s request to overlook the jurisdictional defect

and give retroactive force to a null order. J-S33027-24

We are constrained to vacate the trial court’s order. Given the

procedural posture of this case, we retain jurisdiction but remand for the trial

court to enter a new order on Funes Coreas’ weight claim after the York County

Clerk of Courts receives this Judgment Order. If the trial court’s order is

substantively identical to its order entered January 22, 2024, no further

opinion or briefing shall be required. Following the entry of a new order by

the trial court, the case shall return to this panel.

Order vacated. Case remanded for further proceedings consistent with

this judgment order. Jurisdiction retained.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Com. v. Harris, H.
2020 Pa. Super. 63 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Com. v. Funes Coreas, C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/com-v-funes-coreas-c-pasuperct-2024.