Com. v. Clark, G., II

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 30, 2019
Docket1005 MDA 2018
StatusUnpublished

This text of Com. v. Clark, G., II (Com. v. Clark, G., II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Com. v. Clark, G., II, (Pa. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

J -S22006-19

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

GERALD CARROLL CLARK, II Appellant : No. 1005 MDA 2018

Appeal from the PCRA Order Entered May 17, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Adams County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-01-CR-0001094-2013

BEFORE: SHOGAN, J., DUBOW, J., and PELLEGRINI*, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY SHOGAN, J.: FILED JULY 30, 2019

Gerald Carroll Clark, II1 ("Appellant") appeals from the court order2

incorporating a comprehensive agreement between Appellant and the

Commonwealth to resolve his claims under the Post Conviction Relief Act

("PCRA"), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546. Additionally, counsel has filed a petition

to withdraw representation pursuant to Commonwealth v. Turner, 544 A.2d

1 Appellant's birth name is Gerald Carroll Clark, II. Pro Se Modification of Order, 1/13/17 (Docket Entry No. 83); Order, 5/17/18 at 2. We have amended the caption accordingly.

2 Because Appellant's appeal is from the court's May 17, 2018 order incorporating the parties' agreement and not the revised judgment of sentence, we consider his June 15, 2018 notice of appeal to be timely.

Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. J -S22006-19

927 (Pa. 1988), and Commonwealth v. Finley, 550 A.2d 213 (Pa. Super.

1988) (en banc). We vacate and remand.

On January 17, 2014, Appellant entered a negotiated guilty plea

agreement based on charges arising from his 2013 failure to comply with the

registration requirements applicable to sexual offenders3 and indecent assault

of a child under thirteen years of age.4 Following a classification hearing, the

trial court designated Appellant a sexually violent predator ("SVP") and

sentenced him to incarceration for an aggregate term of six years and three

months to fifteen years: five to ten years on the failure -to -register charge and

one year, three months to five years on the indecent -assault charge. Order,

6/16/14. We affirmed the judgment of sentence. Commonwealth v. Clark,

158 A.3d 167, 58 MDA 2016 (Pa. Super. filed September 2, 2016)

(unpublished memorandum).

Appellant filed a counseled PCRA petition. Before the hearing

commenced on Appellant's PCRA petition, the parties' entered an agreement.

Pursuant to the agreement, Appellant's 2014 failure -to -register conviction and

sentence were vacated; Appellant's SVP designation was vacated; Appellant's

indecent -assault conviction and sentence remained in full force and effect;

Appellant was subject to lifetime registration requirements as a convicted Tier

3 18 Pa.C.S. § 4915(a).

4 18 Pa.C.S. § 3126(a)(7).

-2 J -S22006-19

III sexual offender pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9799.14; and Appellant withdrew

all remaining claims raised in his counseled PCRA petitions. Order, 5/17/18,

at 1-2.

In light of the parties' agreement, the PCRA court gave Appellant credit

for time served on the failure -to -register sentence and corrected the June 16,

2014 sentence to "reflect that [Appellant's] sentence on [indecent assault] of

no less than one year and three months, nor more than five years in a State

Correctional Institution shall be effective September 25, 2013." Order,

5/17/18, at 2.

Based on the record, it is unclear if Appellant has completed his sentence

of one year and three months to five years for indecent assault. Thus, we are

compelled to remand for the PCRA court to determine within twenty days of this Order whether Appellant is still serving a sentence related to the

above -captioned appeal and, therefore, remains eligible for collateral relief.

See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9543(a)(1)(i) ("To be eligible for relief under this

subchapter, the petitioner must plead and prove by a preponderance of the

evidence . . . (1) That the petitioner has been convicted of a crime under the

laws of this Commonwealth and is at the time relief is granted: (i) currently

serving a sentence of imprisonment, probation or parole for the crime[.]").

The PCRA court shall provide an expiration -of -sentence date.

Order vacated. Case remanded with instructions. Panel jurisdiction

retained.

-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Finley
550 A.2d 213 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)
Robinson v. Pleet
544 A.2d 1 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1988)
Com. v. Clark
158 A.3d 167 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Com. v. Clark, G., II, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/com-v-clark-g-ii-pasuperct-2019.