Com. Ex Rel. C. Franell v. Ashe, Warden

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Com. Ex Rel. C. Franell v. Ashe, Warden

3 A.2d 933, 134 Pa. Super. 99, 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 100

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 31, 1939

Docket116, Misc. Docket

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 3 A.2d 933 (Com. Ex Rel. C. Franell v. Ashe, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Com. Ex Rel. C. Franell v. Ashe, Warden, 3 A.2d 933, 134 Pa. Super. 99, 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 100 (Pa. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The facts in this petition for writ of habeas corpus are identical with those in the petition for writ of habeas corpus sued out by Howard Franell, No. 115 Miscellaneous Docket, except that this relator was indicted to No. 27 June Sessions, 1928.

For the reasons therein set forth, the sentence of the relator on the third count — for larceny — is set aside, and the relator is remanded to complete the sentences on the first and second counts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The facts in this petition for writ of habeas corpus are identical with those in the petition for writ of habeas corpus sued out by Howard Franell, No. 115 Miscellaneous Docket, except that this relator was indicted to No. 27 June Sessions, 1928.

For the reasons therein set forth, the sentence of the relator on the third count — for larceny — is set aside, and the relator is remanded to complete the sentences on the first and second counts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.2d 933, 134 Pa. Super. 99, 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/com-ex-rel-c-franell-v-ashe-warden-pasuperct-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack