COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. McCann

604 A.2d 1027, 529 Pa. 444, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 267
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 16, 1992·No. Appeal 27 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1991·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Court being equally divided, the Order of the Commonwealth Court, 135 Pa.Cmwlth. 669, 582 A.2d 438, remains in effect.

NIX, C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT and PAPDAKOS, JJ., would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently granted. LARSEN, ZAPPALA and CAPPY, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. McCann, 604 A.2d 1027, 529 Pa. 444, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 267 (Pa. 1992).

604 A.2d 1027 (COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. McCann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

COM., DEPT. OF TRANS. v. Scott
684 A.2d 539 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)
COM. DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Ingram
648 A.2d 285 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Jennings
627 A.2d 211 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)
COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. McCann
626 A.2d 92 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)