Colvin v. Williams
3 H. & J. 38
Opinion
said, that the sale of bank stock is within the statute of frauds; and that Barklie was the common a- . gent of both the appellee and appellant.
JUDGMENT AITIRMEU.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colvin v. Williams, 3 H. & J. 38 (Md. 1810).
3 H. & J. 38 (Colvin v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. Lingo
110 A. 509 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1920)
Webb v. Baltimore & Eastern Shore Railroad
26 A. 113 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1893)
Banks v. Chas. P. Harris Manuf'g Co.
20 F. 667 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1884)
Passaic Manufacturing Co. v. Hoffman
3 Daly 495 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1871)