Colvin v. Williams
3 H. & J. 38
This text of 3 H. & J. 38 (Colvin v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Colvin v. Williams, 3 H. & J. 38 (Md. 1810).
Opinion
said, that the sale of bank stock is within the statute of frauds; and that Barklie was the common a- . gent of both the appellee and appellant.
JUDGMENT AITIRMEU.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. Lingo
110 A. 509 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1920)
Webb v. Baltimore & Eastern Shore Railroad
26 A. 113 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1893)
Banks v. Chas. P. Harris Manuf'g Co.
20 F. 667 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1884)
Passaic Manufacturing Co. v. Hoffman
3 Daly 495 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1871)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 H. & J. 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colvin-v-williams-md-1810.