Colvin v. State
342 S.W.3d 371, 2011 WL 2237664
Opinion
ORDER
Stephen Colvin appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colvin v. State, 342 S.W.3d 371, 2011 WL 2237664 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
342 S.W.3d 371 (Colvin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.