Colvin v. Colvin

101 S.E. 586, 24 Ga. App. 630, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 976
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 16, 1919·No. 10908·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

Where a son acquired the legal title to certain described lands while he together with his wife and mother was living on the premises, and the mother made to him a quitclaim deed to any interest she might have in the premises, and the son permitted her to continue to live in the house with him, and after his death the property was set apart to his widow as a year’s support, the mother was a tenant at sufferance both as to her son and his widow, who succeeded to the title after the death of her husband, and a summary remedy as provided for by section 5385 of the Civil Code of 1910 was a proper proceeding to evict her from the premises. The trial court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. Kimbrough v. Kimbrough, 99 Ga. 134 (25 S. E. 176); Stanley v. Stembridge, 140 Ga. 750 (79 S. E. 842).

This ruling does not conflict with that made in Edwards v. Blackshear, ante, 622 (101 S. E. 585), as the facts are distinguishable.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colvin v. Colvin, 101 S.E. 586, 24 Ga. App. 630, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 976 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

101 S.E. 586 (Colvin v. Colvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kenner v. Kenner
90 S.E.2d 33 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Williams v. Durham
50 S.E.2d 373 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Savage v. Weeks
37 S.E.2d 549 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
May v. Lee
197 S.E. 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Hixon v. Davis
52 P.2d 1166 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1935)