Colvin Cenac v. Franckline Francois
This text of Colvin Cenac v. Franckline Francois (Colvin Cenac v. Franckline Francois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 23, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-0828 Lower Tribunal No. 23-17046 FC ________________
Colvin Cenac, Appellant,
vs.
Franckline Francois, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marcia Del Rey, Judge.
Colvin Cenac, in proper person.
Franckline Francois, in proper person.
Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Because the Appellant has failed to meet his burden to demonstrate
reversible error, we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee,
377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“When there are issues of fact the
appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the
evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can
not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the
trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative
theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court
reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to
require reversal.”); Pierre v. Bueven, 276 So. 3d 917, 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)
(“Because there is no transcript of the final hearing, this Court is unable to
determine whether there was competent, substantial evidence presented
below that permitted the lower court to properly evaluate the section
61.13(3)(a)-(t) factors when it made its parental responsibility and time-
sharing determinations.”); Montas v. Del Valle, 773 So. 2d 68, 68 (Fla. 3d
DCA 1997) (“A father seeks review of an order which contains a substantial
upward modification in his child support obligations. Because the record
does not include a transcript of the evidentiary proceedings before the
general master or the trial judge, we have no choice but to affirm.”).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Colvin Cenac v. Franckline Francois, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colvin-cenac-v-franckline-francois-fladistctapp-2024.