Columbus Water-Works Co. v. City of Columbus

48 Kan. 378
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 Kan. 378 (Columbus Water-Works Co. v. City of Columbus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Columbus Water-Works Co. v. City of Columbus, 48 Kan. 378 (kan 1892).

Opinion

Per Cu/riam:

Since the overruling" of the demurrer to the petition in this case, the defendants have waived the issuance of the alternative writ, and answered that, to make the tax levy required by the plaintiff under its contract, the city would exceed the limit prescribed by law for levying city taxes. The plaintiff, regarding the answer as a return to the alternative writ, has filed a motion to quash the same.

It appears by a reference to the exhibit, which is made a part of the answer, that the entire levy for what might be termed city taxes, including the water tax, will not exceed 4 per cent., and is not therefore in excess of the amount authorized by ¶796 of the General Statutes of 1889. As we construe this statute, all state, county and school taxes are excluded.

The motion to quash the return is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of Kansas City
140 P. 1040 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Kan. 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-water-works-co-v-city-of-columbus-kan-1892.