Columbus v. Copley

1996 Ohio 342, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1202
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 6, 1996·No. 1995-1828·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 1202.]

CITY OF COLUMBUS, APPELLEE, v. COPLEY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Columbus v. Copley, 1996-Ohio-342.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 95-1828—Submitted October 9, 1996—Decided November 6, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APC06-756. __________________ Ronald J. O’Brien, City Attorney, David M. Buchman, City Prosecutor, and Brenda J. Keltner, Assistant City Prosecutor, for appellee. Max Kravitz, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus v. Copley, 1996 Ohio 342, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1202 (Ohio 1996).

1996 Ohio 342 (Columbus v. Copley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.