Columbus v. Copley
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 1202.]
CITY OF COLUMBUS, APPELLEE, v. COPLEY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Columbus v. Copley, 1996-Ohio-342.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 95-1828—Submitted October 9, 1996—Decided November 6, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APC06-756. __________________ Ronald J. O’Brien, City Attorney, David M. Buchman, City Prosecutor, and Brenda J. Keltner, Assistant City Prosecutor, for appellee. Max Kravitz, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1996 Ohio 342 (Columbus v. Copley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.