Columbus Theatre, Inc. v. Waterman

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Columbus Theatre, Inc. v. Waterman

5 R.I. Dec. 98

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided March 20, 1929·No. Eq. No. 9378; Eq. No. 9379·Published

Opinion

TANNER, P. J.

After evidence had been put in to a considerable extent in these eases, the complainants submitted to a decree that the injunction against the sale of the premises should be dissolved, but ask leave to discontinue the suit.

Under the statute they can not do this as a matter of right and upon consideration of the circumstances of the cases, we are not inclined to grant the request.

The bills are therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TANNER, P. J.

After evidence had been put in to a considerable extent in these eases, the complainants submitted to a decree that the injunction against the sale of the premises should be dissolved, but ask leave to discontinue the suit.

Under the statute they can not do this as a matter of right and upon consideration of the circumstances of the cases, we are not inclined to grant the request.

The bills are therefore dismissed.

Columbus Theatre, Inc. v. Waterman, 5 R.I. Dec. 98 (R.I. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

5 R.I. Dec. 98 (Columbus Theatre, Inc. v. Waterman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.