Columbus S. Power Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Columbus S. Power Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.

745 N.E.2d 1052, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1496, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1130

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 13, 2001

Docket00-2260

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 745 N.E.2d 1052 (Columbus S. Power Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Columbus S. Power Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm., 745 N.E.2d 1052, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1496, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1130 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Public Utilities Commission, Nos. 99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of enforcement of the portion of the entry on rehearing of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio which is the subject of this appeal and the motion for leave to intervene as appellee by Robert S. Tongren, in his capacity as the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel, or, in the alternative, notice of his filing of an amicus brief in support of the appellee,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.

Douglas, J., dissents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to intervene be, and hereby is, granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Public Utilities Commission, Nos. 99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of enforcement of the portion of the entry on rehearing of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio which is the subject of this appeal and the motion for leave to intervene as appellee by Robert S. Tongren, in his capacity as the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel, or, in the alternative, notice of his filing of an amicus brief in support of the appellee,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.

Douglas, J., dissents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to intervene be, and hereby is, granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

745 N.E.2d 1052, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1496, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-s-power-co-v-pub-util-comm-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack