Columbus Railroad v. Love

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Columbus Railroad v. Love

110 S.E. 413, 28 Ga. App. 15, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 460

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 14, 1921·No. 12541·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

The rulings made by this court in Tennessee &c. R. Co. v. Neely, 27 Ga. App. 491 (108 S. E. 629, 630), are controlling in the instant case. The court did not err in refusing to dismiss the petition, on demurrer. See also, Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Stafford, 146 Ga. 206, 209 (91 S. E. 29); Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Jarrett, 22 Ga. App. 313 (4), 314 (96 S. E. 17).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bill, J.J., concur.

The defendant demurred to the petition generally and on the ground that the plaintiff failed to exercise ordinary care.

F. U. Garrard, A. S. Bradley, for plaintiff in error. George C. Palmer, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, P. J.

The rulings made by this court in Tennessee &c. R. Co. v. Neely, 27 Ga. App. 491 (108 S. E. 629, 630), are controlling in the instant case. The court did not err in refusing to dismiss the petition, on demurrer. See also, Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Stafford, 146 Ga. 206, 209 (91 S. E. 29); Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Jarrett, 22 Ga. App. 313 (4), 314 (96 S. E. 17).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bill, J.J., concur.

The defendant demurred to the petition generally and on the ground that the plaintiff failed to exercise ordinary care.

F. U. Garrard, A. S. Bradley, for plaintiff in error. George C. Palmer, contra.

Columbus Railroad v. Love, 110 S.E. 413, 28 Ga. App. 15, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 460 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

110 S.E. 413 (Columbus Railroad v. Love) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related