Columbus Railroad v. Love

110 S.E. 413, 28 Ga. App. 15, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 460
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 14, 1921
Docket12541
StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 413 (Columbus Railroad v. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Columbus Railroad v. Love, 110 S.E. 413, 28 Ga. App. 15, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 460 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

The rulings made by this court in Tennessee &c. R. Co. v. Neely, 27 Ga. App. 491 (108 S. E. 629, 630), are controlling in the instant case. The court did not err in refusing to dismiss the petition, on demurrer. See also, Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Stafford, 146 Ga. 206, 209 (91 S. E. 29); Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Jarrett, 22 Ga. App. 313 (4), 314 (96 S. E. 17).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bill, J.J., concur. The defendant demurred to the petition generally and on the ground that the plaintiff failed to exercise ordinary care. F. U. Garrard, A. S. Bradley, for plaintiff in error. George C. Palmer, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Stafford
91 S.E. 29 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Jarrett
96 S.E. 17 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Tennessee, Alabama & Georgia Railroad v. Neely
108 S.E. 629 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 413, 28 Ga. App. 15, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-railroad-v-love-gactapp-1921.