Columbus Railroad v. Joyce

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Columbus Railroad v. Joyce

107 S.E. 551, 27 Ga. App. 138, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 733

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 6, 1921

Docket12304

StatusPublished

This text of 107 S.E. 551 (Columbus Railroad v. Joyce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Columbus Railroad v. Joyce, 107 S.E. 551, 27 Ga. App. 138, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 733 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

When this case was before this' court on a previous occasion (25 Ga. App. 652, 104 S. E. 21) it was held that the allegations of the petition were sufficient to show a cause of action. On the subsequent trial of the case in the court below, the substantial and material parts of these allegations were sufficiently proved to warrant a verdict for the plaintiff. A careful examination of the motion for a new trial fails to disclose any material error of law in the rulings on testimony, and the charge as a whole presented clearly and fully the issues made by the pleadings and the evidence. Tliere was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

When this case was before this' court on a previous occasion (25 Ga. App. 652, 104 S. E. 21) it was held that the allegations of the petition were sufficient to show a cause of action. On the subsequent trial of the case in the court below, the substantial and material parts of these allegations were sufficiently proved to warrant a verdict for the plaintiff. A careful examination of the motion for a new trial fails to disclose any material error of law in the rulings on testimony, and the charge as a whole presented clearly and fully the issues made by the pleadings and the evidence. Tliere was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 S.E. 551, 27 Ga. App. 138, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-railroad-v-joyce-gactapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack