Columbus Railroad v. Joyce

107 S.E. 551, 27 Ga. App. 138, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 733
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Columbus Railroad v. Joyce. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Ga. App. 652
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 6, 1921·No. 12304·Published

Opinion

Hill, J.

When this case was before this' court on a previous occasion (25 Ga. App. 652, 104 S. E. 21) it was held that the allegations of the petition were sufficient to show a cause of action. On the subsequent trial of the case in the court below, the substantial and material parts of these allegations were sufficiently proved to warrant a verdict for the plaintiff. A careful examination of the motion for a new trial fails to disclose any material error of law in the rulings on testimony, and the charge as a whole presented clearly and fully the issues made by the pleadings and the evidence. Tliere was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus Railroad v. Joyce, 107 S.E. 551, 27 Ga. App. 138, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 733 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

107 S.E. 551 (Columbus Railroad v. Joyce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Columbus Railroad v. Joyce
104 S.E. 21 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)