Columbus Railroad Co. v. City Mills Co.
This text of 34 S.E. 581 (Columbus Railroad Co. v. City Mills Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where one corporation contracted in writing with another having undeveloped water-power in a river to pay to the latter a stated price “per horse-power per annum for the actual use of” such water-power “as fast as [the former] shall develop and actually use the same,” and* the written contract further stipulated that such undeveloped power was "to be only paid for when in actual use,” and further that it was the intention of the clause in the contract relating to this matter that none of the power therein mentioned “is to be paid for when not actually used,” Held, that the proper construction of the terms “actual use” and “actually used” would render the purchasing corporation liable to pay for waterpower developed by it under this contract for such periods of time only as it actually employed and availed itself of the benefit of the power in operating machinery, or otherwise; and that the amount of the compensation to be paid therefor should be arrived at by calculating what it would be for such periods at the yearly rate named in the contract. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 S.E. 581, 110 Ga. 273, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-railroad-co-v-city-mills-co-ga-1899.