Columbus Pro Services, Inc. v. Vera Stevovich Lorain Metropolitan Housing Authority

52 F.3d 325, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18000, 1995 WL 228323
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 1995
Docket94-3332
StatusPublished

This text of 52 F.3d 325 (Columbus Pro Services, Inc. v. Vera Stevovich Lorain Metropolitan Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Columbus Pro Services, Inc. v. Vera Stevovich Lorain Metropolitan Housing Authority, 52 F.3d 325, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18000, 1995 WL 228323 (6th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

52 F.3d 325
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

COLUMBUS PRO SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Vera STEVOVICH; Lorain Metropolitan Housing Authority,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-3332.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 17, 1995.

Before: MILBURN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges; MILES, District Judge.*

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Columbus Pro Services, Inc., appeals from the order of the district court granting summary judgment to defendants, Vera Stevovich and Lorain Metropolitan Housing Authority, in an action arising out of plaintiff's failure to obtain a construction contract.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants. Because the reasons judgment should be entered for defendants have been articulated by the magistrate judge below, the issuance of a written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by the magistrate judge in his Memorandum Opinion dated February 15, 1994.

*

The Honorable Wendell A. Miles, United States District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 F.3d 325, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18000, 1995 WL 228323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-pro-services-inc-v-vera-stevovich-lorain--ca6-1995.