Columbus Metro. Hous. Auth. v. Flowers

Ohio Supreme Court

Columbus Metro. Hous. Auth. v. Flowers

93 Ohio St. 3d 1256

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 17, 2001

Docket01-1035

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1256 (Columbus Metro. Hous. Auth. v. Flowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Columbus Metro. Hous. Auth. v. Flowers, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1256 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 00AP-833. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal as of right. On June 7, 2001, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. PV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.CtPrac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within ten days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 111(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 00AP-833. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal as of right. On June 7, 2001, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. PV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.CtPrac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within ten days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 111(6).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. 3d 1256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-metro-hous-auth-v-flowers-ohio-2001.