Columbus Grocery & Supply Co. v. Green
170 S.E. 205, 47 Ga. App. 197, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 344
Opinion
(After stating the foregoing facts.) In our opinion the amended petition set out a cause of action, and the court did not err in overruling all the grounds, general and special, of the demurrer interposed. See Huey v. Atlanta, 8 Ga. App. 597 (2, 3) (70 S. E. 71); Southern Hotel Co. v. Evans, 28 Ga. App. 161 (110 S. E. 459); Fulton Ice & Coal Co. v. Pece, 29 Ga. App. 507, 515 (116 S. E. 57).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Columbus Grocery & Supply Co. v. Green, 170 S.E. 205, 47 Ga. App. 197, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 344 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).
170 S.E. 205 (Columbus Grocery & Supply Co. v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chambers v. Peacock Construction Co.
155 S.E.2d 704 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Cox v. Greenfield
179 S.E. 178 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)