Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co. v. Buford

Supreme Court

Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co. v. Buford

281 U.S. 695, 50 S. Ct. 248, 74 L. Ed. 1123, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 431

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 17, 1930·No. No. 339·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question; Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co: v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180,183,184; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 326, 334.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question; Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co: v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180,183,184; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 326, 334.

Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co. v. Buford, 281 U.S. 695, 50 S. Ct. 248, 74 L. Ed. 1123, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 431 (1930).

Pincite

281 U.S. 695 (Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co. v. Buford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related