Columbus City v. Hirt

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Columbus City v. Hirt

140 N.E.2d 589, 74 Ohio Law. Abs. 323, 1954 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 344

CourtCourt of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

DecidedSeptember 24, 1954

DocketNo. 190270

StatusPublished

This text of 140 N.E.2d 589 (Columbus City v. Hirt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Columbus City v. Hirt, 140 N.E.2d 589, 74 Ohio Law. Abs. 323, 1954 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 344 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

[324]*324OPINION

By BARTLETT, J.

Motion to dismiss application of plaintiff to impanel a jury to assess compensation to be paid owners of property described therein, is overruled. Exceptions saved.

Entry presented at oral hearing approved and filed.

Defendants contend it is impossible to have jury view the premises, yet on same date they filed the formal statutory demand that a view of the premises be ordered by the Court and that the jury view said premises.

Difficulty of proving the value of such property does not constitute a bar to the appropriation thereof for public purposes.

This Court will take judicial notice of the fact that much of the surrounding property has already been appropriated for the Hoover dam, but the fact that the environmental surroundings of the defendants’ property have thus been changed, offers no bar to the appropriation of their property for such purpose.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI