Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Wright

Ohio Supreme Court

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Wright

568 N.E.2d 1218, 58 Ohio St. 3d 126, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 691

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 27, 1991

DocketNo. 90-1146

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 568 N.E.2d 1218 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Wright, 568 N.E.2d 1218, 58 Ohio St. 3d 126, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 691 (Ohio 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and recommendations of the board, but modify the sanction based on information received at oral argument that respondent is afflicted with alcohol addiction. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law in this state for two years, but stay eighteen months of that suspension and place respondent on probation on condition that he receive treatment for his alcohol addiction and that the probation be supervised and monitored by relator as provided in Gov. Bar R. V(23). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and recommendations of the board, but modify the sanction based on information received at oral argument that respondent is afflicted with alcohol addiction. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law in this state for two years, but stay eighteen months of that suspension and place respondent on probation on condition that he receive treatment for his alcohol addiction and that the probation be supervised and monitored by relator as provided in Gov. Bar R. V(23). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 N.E.2d 1218, 58 Ohio St. 3d 126, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-bar-assn-v-wright-ohio-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack