Columbus Bar Assn. v. Winkfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Winkfield

2014 Ohio 2491, 13 N.E.3d 1173, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1248

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 12, 2014

Docket2000-1138

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2014 Ohio 2491 (Columbus Bar Assn. v. Winkfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Winkfield, 2014 Ohio 2491, 13 N.E.3d 1173, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1248 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Lawrence Edward Winkfield, Attorney Registration No. 0034254, last known business address in Westerville, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court, coming now to consider its order of April 11, 2001, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with the final year stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio on the conditions that respondent (1) serve a three-year monitored probation, with a monitor assigned by relator, and that such monitor’s principal office be located within the Columbus, Ohio, metropolitan area, (2) fulfill all recommendations of mental-health practitioners, including ongoing and routine psychotherapy counsel and treatment as recommended by Dr. Jerry M. Zober or another licensed psychiatrist, and (3) refrain from any illegal conduct.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this order, relator shall file with the clerk of this court the name of the attorney who will serve as respondent’s monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9). It is further ordered that at the end of respondent’s probationary period, relator shall file with the clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation.

{¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period, respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. V(9). It is further ordered that respondent’s probation shall not be terminated until (1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the clerk of this court a report indicating *1249 that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court orders that the probation be terminated.

{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Lawrence Edward Winkfield, Attorney Registration No. 0034254, last known business address in Westerville, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court, coming now to consider its order of April 11, 2001, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with the final year stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio on the conditions that respondent (1) serve a three-year monitored probation, with a monitor assigned by relator, and that such monitor’s principal office be located within the Columbus, Ohio, metropolitan area, (2) fulfill all recommendations of mental-health practitioners, including ongoing and routine psychotherapy counsel and treatment as recommended by Dr. Jerry M. Zober or another licensed psychiatrist, and (3) refrain from any illegal conduct.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this order, relator shall file with the clerk of this court the name of the attorney who will serve as respondent’s monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9). It is further ordered that at the end of respondent’s probationary period, relator shall file with the clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation.

{¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period, respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. V(9). It is further ordered that respondent’s probation shall not be terminated until (1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the clerk of this court a report indicating *1249 that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court orders that the probation be terminated.

{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2014 Ohio 2491, 13 N.E.3d 1173, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-bar-assn-v-winkfield-ohio-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack