Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Potts

603 N.E.2d 986, 65 Ohio St. 3d 297, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 3123
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 1992·No. No. 92-1392·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and the exhibits and we concur in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Potts, 603 N.E.2d 986, 65 Ohio St. 3d 297, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 3123 (Ohio 1992).

603 N.E.2d 986 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Potts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Potts
673 N.E.2d 1378 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)