Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Pfefferle

417 N.E.2d 105, 65 Ohio St. 2d 4, 19 Ohio Op. 3d 121, 1981 Ohio LEXIS 432
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 25, 1981·No. No. 80-17·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is ample evidence in the record to support the findings of the board of commissioners that respondent was guilty of misconduct as alleged herein. Cf. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Kahn (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 15; Toledo Bar Assn. v. Ishler (1974), 39 Ohio St. 2d 33; Toledo Bar Assn. v. Illman (1969), 18 Ohio St. 2d 122; Cleveland Bar Assn. v. [6] Hamilton (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d 264; Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Rekeweg (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d 128; Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Gray (1965), 1 Ohio St. 2d 97.

We concur in the recommendation of the board of commissioners, and respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Kerns and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Kerns, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for Holmes, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Pfefferle, 417 N.E.2d 105, 65 Ohio St. 2d 4, 19 Ohio Op. 3d 121, 1981 Ohio LEXIS 432 (Ohio 1981).

417 N.E.2d 105 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Pfefferle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Morton
450 N.E.2d 275 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1983)