Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Pfefferle
This text of 417 N.E.2d 105 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Pfefferle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is ample evidence in the record to support the findings of the board of commissioners that respondent was guilty of misconduct as alleged herein. Cf. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Kahn (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 15; Toledo Bar Assn. v. Ishler (1974), 39 Ohio St. 2d 33; Toledo Bar Assn. v. Illman (1969), 18 Ohio St. 2d 122; Cleveland Bar Assn. v. [6]*6Hamilton (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d 264; Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Rekeweg (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d 128; Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Gray (1965), 1 Ohio St. 2d 97.
We concur in the recommendation of the board of commissioners, and respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 N.E.2d 105, 65 Ohio St. 2d 4, 19 Ohio Op. 3d 121, 1981 Ohio LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-bar-assn-v-pfefferle-ohio-1981.