Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Moushey

787 N.E.2d 9, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1547
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Moushey. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 Ohio St. 3d 461
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 2003·No. 2002-0677·Published

Opinion

On October 2, 2002, this court indefinitely suspended respondent, Michael Lee Moushey, Attorney Registration No. 0033805, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio. On March 20, 2003, relator, Columbus Bar Association, filed a motion for order to show cause why respondent should not be held in contempt for failing to obey this court’s October 2, 2002 order by continuing to engage in the practice of law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion be and is hereby granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before 20 days from the date of this order why respondent should not be held in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Moushey, 787 N.E.2d 9, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1547 (Ohio 2003).

787 N.E.2d 9 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Moushey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.