Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Margulis

Ohio Supreme Court

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Margulis

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 263

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 13, 1963·No. D. D. No. 40·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court, from a consideration of the record, is of the opinion that the board was neither in error nor unreasonable in its recommendation. Therefore, the objections to the recommendation of the board are overruled, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered suspending respondent for an indefinite period from the practice of law.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This court, from a consideration of the record, is of the opinion that the board was neither in error nor unreasonable in its recommendation. Therefore, the objections to the recommendation of the board are overruled, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered suspending respondent for an indefinite period from the practice of law.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Margulis, 174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 263 (Ohio 1963).

Pincite

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 263 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Margulis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.